Why Your Content Strategy Feels Harder Than It Should
The Copywriter Column #244
Every spring, you tell yourself you’re going to clean up your content strategy.
You open the spreadsheet. You tag a few old posts. And then, about two hours in, the energy dies. The audit becomes a catalog. The catalog becomes a project. The project gets deprioritized. Nothing gets cut.
Sound familiar?
The problem isn’t the audit. It’s the mindset behind it. An audit catalogs. It tells you what you have. What most content strategies actually need isn’t an audit at all. It’s an edit.
An edit makes judgments. It asks what belongs and what doesn’t. It requires a standard, not just a spreadsheet.
Before you can cut well, you need to know what you’re cutting toward.
How Strategies Accumulate Instead of Evolve
Nobody plans to build a bloated content library. It happens gradually, one reasonable decision at a time.
A new product launches, so you add a topic cluster. A trend gets hot, so you cover it. A team member has a good idea, so you publish it.
Each addition makes sense in the moment. The problem is that nothing ever gets removed.
New topics get added. Old ones don’t get retired. Publishing cadence gets mistaken for strategic momentum. “I’ve always covered this” becomes a rationale by default.
Over time, your content library stops reflecting where you’re going. It starts reflecting where you’ve been.
The strategy that made sense two years ago is still running, quietly, in the background, pulling in the wrong readers, signaling the wrong things, confusing the audience you’re actually trying to reach.
A content strategy that never gets pruned eventually becomes a history of old assumptions.
That’s not a library.
That’s an archive.
Set the Standard Before You Pick Up the Scissors
Here’s where most pruning efforts go wrong. A lot of folks skip straight to the cutting and either remove too little because they’re afraid, or too much because they’re frustrated.
Both outcomes come from the same root cause: no clear standard for what earns a place in the strategy.
Before you touch a single piece of content, get honest answers to these questions:
What is this piece supposed to do? Attract new readers? Educate existing ones? Support a conversion? Retain a customer? If you can’t answer that, the piece doesn’t have a job.
Who is it actually for? Not in theory. Right now, given your current audience and positioning, is this for the person you’re trying to reach?
Is it still true? Markets shift. Your thinking evolves. A piece that was accurate two years ago might be actively misleading today.
Does it reflect how you think now, or how you used to think? This one is quieter, but it matters. Your content is a public record of your perspective. Old thinking left up without context is a credibility problem waiting to happen.
Here’s a simple test: if a piece of content fell off your site tomorrow and nobody noticed, what does that tell you?
You don’t need a complex scoring rubric. You really just need honest answers to simple questions.
Where AI Actually Helps
This is one of those processes where AI earns its keep, not as a decision-maker, but as a pattern-spotter.
The tedious parts of a content review — cross-referencing topics, flagging redundancies, summarizing what you’ve already said and how often — are exactly the kind of work AI handles well.
Feed it your content library and ask it to surface themes you’ve covered repeatedly.
Ask it to identify topic clusters where you have four pieces saying roughly the same thing.
Ask it to compare older content against your current positioning language and flag where the gap is widest.
What AI can’t tell you is whether a piece still matters to your audience, or whether a weak performer is underperforming because the topic is exhausted or because the execution was just bad.
That distinction changes the call entirely. A bad piece on a strong topic deserves a rewrite. A solid piece on a dead topic deserves retirement.
AI speeds up the inventory, but you should still have to make the call.
How to Cut Without Panicking
Most people hesitate to cut content for a reason that sounds strategic but isn’t: sunk cost.
“We put a lot of work into this.”
“It might pick up traffic later.”
“I don’t want to lose what we built.”
These feel like caution. They’re actually attachment. And attachment to old content is one of the quietest ways a strategy stays stuck.
The move is to replace that instinct with a clearer one. Every piece of content you review deserves one of three calls.
1. Retire it. The content no longer reflects your positioning, your audience, or what you know to be true. It’s not just underperforming. It’s misaligned. Keeping it doesn’t preserve value. It creates confusion.
The governing question: does this still represent how you think?
2. Update it. The core idea is sound, but the execution is dated, incomplete, or underdeveloped relative to where your thinking is now. This is the most common call, and the most underused. You’re likely quicker to publish new content than to strengthen what already exists.
The governing question: is the foundation worth keeping, even if the structure needs work?
3. Consolidate it. You’ve covered this topic in three different places, and none of them do it definitively. Pick the strongest version, build it out, and let the others go. Your audience doesn’t need four takes on the same subject. They need one clear one.
The governing question: are you adding clarity or just adding volume?
Across all three calls, there’s one governing question that cuts through the noise: is this content still doing a job? Not “is it good?” Not “did it used to work?” Is it earning its place right now?
The content you keep is a statement about what you currently believe. Treat it like one.
The Edit Is the System
This isn’t about getting lean for spring. It’s about building a habit of editorial judgment.
The brands and strategists with the clearest content aren’t necessarily publishing less. They’re publishing with more intention. And they’ve stopped letting the library grow by default and started asking, regularly, whether what’s there is still doing what it’s supposed to do.
The annual audit isn’t the system.
The question “does this still belong?” is the system.
Spring is just a reminder.
The edit should be ongoing.
Want to dive deeper into the principles that make copy actually work for your team?
I’ve distilled 20+ years of marketing expertise into a free micro-course called The Minimalist Copywriter’s Playbook. It covers the 5 core principles I use every time I sit down to write – ones you can apply immediately.
The Copywriter Column is a weekly glimpse into the mind of an agency copywriter. Thinking about subscribing? Here’s what else you can expect.