The One Thing AI Can't Learn, No Matter How Good Your Prompts Get
The Copywriter Column #247
I’ve been thinking about this for a few weeks now, and while my thoughts aren’t fully formed on the topic, I thought I’d share where my head’s at anyway. So here it goes.
Yes, you can teach AI to write copy. Good copy, even. You can feed it frameworks, voice guidelines, swipe files, persona docs. You can even build entire skill sets for it.
I know this because I’ve done it.
I’ve sat at my desk and codified the way I think about conversion copy into something a machine can execute on command.
And it works.
It works really well, actually.
So when people ask me what the safety net is for copywriters, I don’t think I can give them the answer many of them want. Because the answer they want is “skill.”
But like I just indicated, skill really isn’t it.
Here’s the thing most copywriters in my industry don’t want to sit with want to ignore.
The frameworks are teachable.
The formulas are teachable.
The editing sweeps, the structure of persuasion, the way you build an argument from a headline down through a CTA.
ALL of it can be transferred to a machine.
Again, I’m not speculating here. I’ve done the transfer myself. I’ve taught other people how to do it. I’ve even been paid to do it for other people.
Our profession’s instinct right now is to defend skill, to say “AI can’t do what I do.”
And I get it. It’s a natural response when you feel threatened but you also don’t quite understand the thing you’re being threatened by.
But again, “AI can’t do what I do” is the wrong argument, and it loses every time someone runs a side-by-side and can’t tell the difference.
My advice? Stop defending skill. It was never the differentiator.
So, what is?
In the copy-sphere I operate inside of, the goal of much copywriting is to get a conversion. A client sends an email to customers, and in return, they want customers to click links and buy products.
But getting customers to buy isn’t that easy because buying is not a logic problem.
I know we talk about it like one. We talk about objection handling and feature-benefit alignment and value stacking. And all of that matters at a structural level.
But the moment someone actually decides to buy? That’s not logic. That’s emotion, rationalized after the fact.
The copy that converts doesn’t inform the reader. It resonates with them. It meets them inside a feeling they haven’t quite named yet and says it back to them in their own language.
And that kind of resonance doesn’t come from research.
It doesn’t come from a persona brief or a customer interview transcript.
It comes from having been there.
Having felt the thing.
Not studied it.
Lived it.
Because there’s a gap between “knowing about” a feeling and “having felt it.” And that gap is the entire distance between copy that describes and copy that converts.
Enter, AI…
In this scenario, AI has a knowledge gap. Granted, that one’s closeable. Better prompts, better context, better inputs. You can close it with effort, and it’ll shrink over time.
But AI also has what I’d call a category gap, and unfortunately for it (and every other broccoli-haired writer who lacks a heartbeat), that category gap doesn’t close with better prompts or more data.
Not… ever.
AI has never wanted something badly.
Never felt the specific embarrassment of a problem you’re too ashamed to Google.
Never sat next to someone you love and watched a sunset and felt, in your chest, that time was running out.
That’s not just a limitation of the model.
It’s a limitation of the medium.
AI can replicate the structure of persuasion, but it cannot replicate the origin of it, which is a human being who has wanted something badly, been afraid of something real, and felt the gap between where they are and where they want to be.
This matters most at the conversion layer. I want to be specific about that.
I’m not talking about blog content or SEO pages or product descriptions. Those layers have already been repriced. A lot of what passed for “copywriting” was really just information assembly anyway. For good or ill, AI is better at that. Fine.
The conversion layer is different though. It’s the copy that sits at the moment of decision. The last few seconds before someone either commits or bounces.
And that’s where emotional authenticity does the most work. That’s where a reader needs to feel like the person who wrote the thing gets it.
Anyone can write a feature list. But the writer who converts is the one who names the feeling the reader hasn’t named for themselves yet.
And you can only do that if you’ve felt it. Not studied it. Not researched it. Felt it. In your body. In your memory.
The “riches” aren’t in the “niches.”
They’re not even just in the conversion layer.
They’re in the human being with breath and a heartbeat at the conversion layer.
So, yeah. Skill is one thing. But the lived experience is a whole other.
Seasonal copy falls flat when writers skip the fundamentals.
The Copy Principles Swipe File is a reference guide built around the principles that make copy work regardless of the season, the campaign, or the brief.
Not tactics. Not templates. The underlying thinking that drives copy that actually connects.
If you want copy that has real weight to it, start here.
The Copywriter Column is a weekly glimpse into the mind of an agency copywriter. Thinking about subscribing? Here’s what else you can expect.